The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Wednesday November
23rd 2016 arraigned the quartet of Colonel Nicholas Ashinze, a former
special assistant to the embattled former National Security Adviser,
Col. Sambo Dasuki; an Austrian, Wolfgang Reinl; Edidiong Idiong and
Sagir D. Mohammed before Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High
Court, Abuja on a 13-count charge of corruption and money laundering to
the tune of N36.8billion.
Ashinze and his co-accused were arraigned alongside five companies
accused of allegedly diverting huge sums from the office of the former
NSA.
The companies are: Geonel Integrated Services
Limited, Unity Continental Nigeria Limited, Helpline Organization,
Vibrant Resource Limited and Sologic Integrated Services Limited.
Count three of the charge reads:
“That you, Col. Nicholas Ashinze, being a serving officer of the
Nigerian Army and a former Special Assistant (SA) to the immediate past
National security Adviser, Wolfgang Reinl, being an Austrian national
and managing director of Geonel Integrated Services Limited and Geonel
Integrated Services Limited on or about 22nd April, 2014 at Abuja, in
the Judicial Division of the Federal High Court did transfer the sum of
Five Hundred and Fifty Million Naira (N550,000,000.00) to Edidiong
Idiong, being a lawyer practicing in the name of Law Partners &
Associates, knowing that the said sum forms part of the proceeds of an
unlawful act to wit :
‘corruption’ and thereby committed an offense contrary to Section 15 (2)
(b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2011 (as amended) and
punishable under Section 15 (3) and (4) of the same Money Laundering
(Prohibition), Act 2011 (as amended).”
The defendants pleaded not guilty to all the charges preferred against them.
In view of their plea, counsel to EFCC, I. O Uket expressed readiness
for trial to commence immediately saying he had the witnesses present in
court.
“If the court is ready, we are also ready to produce our first witness as we have our witnesses in court”, he said.
But, Ashinze’s counsel, Ernest Nwoye told the court that he had a
pending application for the bail of his client. He urged the court to
grant the defendant bail on self recognizance having earlier been
admitted to bail by an FCT High Court.
Afam Osigwe, counsel representing the second and fifth defendants, also
prayed the court to admit Reinl to bail. He stated that he has been
enjoying administrative bail from the EFCC since February. He said that
his travel documents are in the possession of the Commission. He added
that the accused has lived in Nigeria for over 23 years and is married
to a Nigerian.
In his argument, counsel to the third defendant, Paul Erokoro, SAN, said
his client, Idiong, being a legal practitioner knows what it means to
jump bail. He stated that, aside the fact that he had earlier been
grated bail by an FCT High Court, he had always made himself available
to the EFCC.
In a similar vein, counsel representing the fourth defendant, N. Jimoh,
while praying the court to grant his client bail presented 6 exhibits
marked exhibits A-F respectively, to the effect that the accused had a
health challenge which he had been managing for close to forty years.
Responding, Uket argued that the defendants had lost their
administrative bail the moment their matter was charged to court and
their counsels filed applications for their bail.
“We are aware that the defendants are enjoying administrative bail.
Their counsels understand that any administrative bail granted ends as
soon as the matter is brought to court and bail applications are filed.
Such bail cannot be extended since the charges have now been preferred
to the defendants. We therefore urge the court to deny the bail
application”, he submitted.
Ruling on the applications, Justice Kolawole held that the charges are
all bailable adding that, “since each of the defendants has been on one
administrative bail or the other, my sixth judicial sense informs me
that I adopt the terms and conditions of the bail granted to the
defendants by the EFCC and my learned brothers in the FCT High Courts.
The judge added that the case would be granted accelerated hearing and
urged the prosecution to pick five days in the new year for trial.
Consequently, the case was adjourned to January 23, February 1 and14;
and March 7 and 21, 2017.